Since mid-2014, Euro’s sharp devaluation, currency volatility and political dynamics is resulting in dwindling sales for luxury brands ensuing in many of them to increase prices in Europe to balance revenues. On the other hand, international luxury brands are fast adjusting prices to boost sales in China to garner bigger share in the expanding market, as fast fashion brands massively expand through e-commerce.
Oflate, the luxury industry is looking for ways to address a problem that has emerged from one of their most important growth market, i.e. China. A weak euro and high Chinese tariffs on luxury goods have combined to create a large gap in the cost of luxury goods inside and outside China. Several European luxury brands have adjusted prices globally to offset this price differentiation. According to industry experts, brands are trying to balance the price difference in the European and Asian markets and boost sales by raising prices in Europe and lowering prices in Asia, in order to cool the international buying services market. It is expected that luxury brands will offer similar discounts in the near future and some brands have already announced that they will cut prices. These include luxury brands such as Chanel, Prada, Burberry, etc.
FACTORS LEADING TO LUXURY BRANDS ADJUSTING PRICES
Weak Euro
Political scenario
Fast fashion brands expanding rapidly through e-commerce
Currency volatility
In March, Chanel announced that it will increase prices in Europe by 20 per cent and decrease them in China by a similar amount, to discourage the ‘daigou’ grey market shopping agents, who buy at lower prices overseas and resell to consumers in China. This shift was also to align prices in anticipation of the global e-commerce push by fast fashion brands. Following Chanel’s example, Prada lowered prices in China, but kept the European prices same due to weak demand from the market. Similarly, Burberry, Richemont’s Cartier and Patek Philippe have moved to harmonise their prices globally following the rise of US dollars, weak Euro and the surge in Swiss Franc. Still, a few brands such as Kering have taken a ‘wait and see’ approach, while LVMH has categorically stated that unified exchange rates (consistent pricing across markets) is not a strategy that the company advocates as it limits flexibility for luxury brands.
Amidst the global pricing shifts, political scenario has also potentially changed the dynamics for many luxury brands. Amongst this is the recent announcement by China’s State Council, declaring a crackdown on grey market imports by ordering more transparent and consistent tax collection, while increasing seizures of counterfeit products. Further, the Council has requested a reduction in import duties by July in order to stimulate local demand that has been weak.
According to industry experts, brands are trying to balance the price difference in the European and Asian markets and boost sales by raising prices in Europe and lowering prices in Asia, in order to cool the international buying services market. Amidst the global pricing shifts, political scenario has also potentially changed the dynamics for many luxury brands.
Amongst this is the recent announcement by China’s State Council, declaring a crackdown on grey market imports by ordering more transparent and consistent tax collection, while increasing seizures of counterfeit products.
Due to the changing political scenario, grey market trading would certainly be less attractive but this alone is unlikely to change the behaviour of Chinese consumers to shop abroad as factors that have long driven overseas purchases such as greater prestige, better service and product selection, privacy and anonymity, lower taxes are as important as the prices. Also, many brands have underestimated the Chinese renminbi (RMB), assuming that it will remain resolutely stable. Currently, China has immense assets at its disposal, but with the housing bubble, a slowing economy and rumours of increasing capital flight, absolute stability of its currency cannot be guaranteed. If the devaluation of the RMB happens, then it could have a tremendous negative impact on luxury brands.
In the meanwhile, a weak euro has resulted in a significant high in the price difference between the same goods in Europe and China as certain luxury goods are 60 per cent more expensive in China than they were in Europe. According to Global Blue, a Tourism Shopping Refund Company in Switzerland, sales in Europe due to Chinese tourists have soared in recent months. Also, considering the US market, the prices are on average 30 per cent higher than Europe, but the country continues to attract Chinese travellers and resellers.
The brands that have chosen a ‘wait and see’ approach will benefit the most as the economic factors seem to be continuously shifting. Currently, the weak US market has led the Federal Reserve to postpone increasing lending rates, leading to a rapid and significant downward movement for the US dollar. After reaching a high of 1.04 in March 2015, the dollar in recent weeks lost almost 9 per cent against the euro, reaching a low of 1.14 in May 2015. Likewise, the euro is not expected to strengthen significantly given the current monetary policy of the European Central Bank. It remains to be seen how international economic dynamics and Chinese policies evolve in the short- to medium-term and what their impact will be on the luxury industry. As currencies are prone to volatility, so strategy-based on currency fluctuations can prove risky. Brands that choose to ‘wait and see’ are probably in the best position to be resilient.




















